Campaign 2006: Floridians to Consider Amendment One and Fiscal Responsibility

Gov. Jeb Bush says Amendment One would put an important long-range outlook for state spending into Florida’s constitution, but even supporters have some concerns about whether we really need another task force.

Bush won’t be in office next spring when lawmakers craft what will likely be about an $80 billion state budget, but he’s a big supporter of a proposed constitutional amendment to limit the amount of one-time money the Legislature can use for ongoing state costs.

"The problem with state governments across the country is they use non-recurring money to spend on recurring obligations," said the governor. "When the non-recurring money goes away, they say, 'Oh, we need to raise taxes.' This puts a limit on that availability."

If Amendment One passes, lawmakers could only use up to three of one-time money for ongoing expenses. They’d have to take a vote if they wanted to raise that limit.

Dominic Calabro heads the fiscally conservative watchdog group TaxWatch. He says the three percent limit doesn’t go far enough.

"We think you should use zero percent of one-time, non-recurring revenue for recurring expenses," Calabro said. "Otherwise, it’s fiscal mischief."

The amendment would also create a government efficiency task force to develop a long-range financial plan for the state. Opponents argue the amendment really isn’t necessary as long as lawmakers do their job.

Lawmakers voted to put Amendment One on the ballot in 2004, saying the state needs to do a better job of future financial planning.