Overhaul to Military Pensions?
Save Email Print
Bookmark and Share
Posted: 8:57 PM Aug 16, 2011
Overhaul to Military Pensions?
Number crunching at the Pentagon could mean major changes to retirement programs for men and women serving in the military. A Pentagon task force is proposing the largest overhaul ever to the military pension system. It would create a 401K style plan.
Reporter: Kelly Wright

Overhaul to Military Pensions?
Font Size:

A new report released by a panel of military advisors would eliminate the current pension retirement system where anyone who serves twenty years is eligible for half their salary.

Instead they would get a 401K style plan with government contributions.

The defense business board says the current system is unfair, inflexible and expensive; totaling 24-billion-dollars for this fiscal year alone.

Future liability would grow from 1.3-trillion to 2.7 trillion by 2034.

It cites how increases in inflation and life expectancy has increased retirement pay for our armed forces.

The board is concerned these continuing rising costs could undermine war-fighting capabilities.

Advocates say the new system would not only save money -- but would also be more fair.

Giving benefits to those who serve less than 20 years, who currently get nothing.

It would also give more money to those in combat or high risk situations.

Now critics of the plan say it won't attract those who see the benefits of a military career as a safe bet...

Major General Bob Scales, U.S. Army - Retired, says "My fear is the quality of the force will decline because the rewards of serving will go down."

AMVETS -- a service organization for american veterans -- says the plan changes the game on active-duty service people who are relying on the 20-year retirement plan and the promise about retirement they got when they joined up.

The plan is just a proposed framework at the moment. It's in the early stages and finished plan would require congressional approval.


Latest Comments

Posted by: Wow! on Aug 17, 2011 at 03:54 PM

Mary, he didn't give his rank. I was in the army for 3 years, got the GI bill, finished college, and bought a house with a VA loan. I don't get retirement for 3 years but I did well for my service. The pay was pretty bad but I was young and didn't really need money then. If major changes are made for people currently in service it would be in very bad faith. The 401k thing should only apply to future service men. Those entering service may balk at gambling in the market as opposed to a fixed retirement but that is the recruiters problem. It should get harder to get into the military as everything becomes high tech. Heck, a future rifle could require a college degree to use. Well, at least good math skills.
Posted by: Lifer on Aug 17, 2011 at 02:42 PM

Only a Federal Job, not private. And only suspended during that period, if a second retirement is earned, then they can both pick back up at the point of the second retirement.
Posted by: LIN on Aug 17, 2011 at 01:14 PM

Let us reduce their (Reps. and Sens.) benefits now!
Pinpoint Weather
Click Maps to Enlarge
WCTV Online Poll
Do you think concealed guns should be allowed on college campuses?

Yes - they should be allowed
Yes - but only with a permit
No - I don't want guns on campus


The faculty senate at Valdosta State University is taking a stand against concealed guns on campus. They unanimously passed a resolution last week to keep guns out of the classrooms and off university grounds. The faculty senate is standing in opposition to house bill 981. The bill proposed allowing citizens the right to carry concealed weapons into bars.. churches.. college campuses and even elementary schools.
Commenting Policy
Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.

For more on WCTV’s policy regarding viewer comments, click here.