Measures Barring Public Funding of Abortions Advance

By: Carol Gentry, Health News Florida
By: Carol Gentry, Health News Florida

Tallahassee, FL - Two measures that would bar public money from subsidizing abortion coverage in Florida in nearly all cases, even indirectly, passed the Senate Health Regulation Committee on Monday.

One bill (SB 1414) would apply to policies sold on the health-insurance exchange that will be set up by 2014 as part of the federal health law, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA).

The bill, sponsored by Sen. Stephen R. Wise, R-Jacksonville, would block the purchase of policies that include coverage of abortion if public money is involved in any way – such as a subsidy for the person who is shopping for coverage, for example, or as a business tax credit.

The other measure approved by the committee, a proposed amendment to the state Constitution, would prohibit any public funding for abortion unless the patient herself would die without one. It is sponsored by Sen. Anitere Flores, R-Miami.

Unlike Wise’s bill, it would make no exception for cases involving rape or incest. Flores explained: “If you believe it’s a life, you need to protect it.”

But some senators found the omission of those exceptions in the proposed amendment (SJR 1538) troubling. Two said that they would support it in committee with the understanding that those two exceptions must be added, and with their votes it passed 7 to 5.

“Before I vote for this on the floor, that’s going to have to be in there,” warned Sen. Jack Latvala, R-St. Petersburg.

If the constitutional amendment is approved by the Legislature and the voters, it would apply to coverage for state employees and local-government workers throughout Florida, such as teachers, police and firefighters.

Neither of the measures would allow for any public money to go toward coverage of abortion when the patient’s health is deteriorating from the pregnancy – as long as she is not likely to die -- or when the fetus is deformed or terminally ill.

The health-exchange bill would have the effect of taking away the kind of insurance now held by 86 percent of those covered by employer-sponsored plans, said Stephanie Kunkel of Planned Parenthood.

Wise said those who want insurance for abortions could take a separate policy, or rider. But Sen. Eleanor Sobel, D-Hollywood, said states that have tried that approach found that companies don’t offer them.

Sen. Mike Bennett said he personally opposes abortion but couldn’t support measures that take away personal freedom.

“I have a problem as a Republican telling companies what they can and can’t offer and telling consumers what they can and can’t buy,” said Bennett, R-Bradenton.

The ACA allows states to set up their own health-insurance exchange or to use one provided by the federal government. Florida officials, who are suing to have the ACA thrown out, have not said which path they will follow if they are unsuccessful.

Wise’s bill passed 8 to 4. It still must be heard by the Senate Banking and Insurance and Budget Committees.

You must be logged in to post comments.

Password (case sensitive):
Remember Me:

Read Comments

Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
  • by m Location: tally on Mar 15, 2011 at 09:54 AM
    I am so sick of a man telling women what is good for them. Let them have a few babies & they will change thier minds. All this is going to lead to coat hanger abortions, women and children will die as a result of this. Not only to say how many children will wind up in foster care, that can not be adopted by good people..If your a man stay out of what is good or bad for women's bodies and we will stay out of yours..Maybe we should start doing castrations.. I know a lot women who would be happy to pass that bill and I bet we could get the insuranse companies to pay. Legislature lets get busy on this budget and let us worrie about our health.
  • by Ugh on Mar 15, 2011 at 06:14 AM
    There is evidence to support the drop in crime since abortions became legal in our country. This is just another step backwards... And before anyone complains that abortion is unholy, I ask you this: Why should a 13 year old girl, raped by a sibling, have to carry that child?
  • by Tom Location: Tallahassee on Mar 15, 2011 at 05:22 AM
    Compaired to the giant medical costs related to child birth and rearing abortions are chump change. Insurance companies have always paid 100% of abortion cost because it saved them so much money. Has the state consitered how much more insurance will cost if that bill passes? Where will the money come from?
WCTV 1801 Halstead Blvd. Tallahassee, FL 32309
Copyright © 2002-2016 - Designed by Gray Digital Media - Powered by Clickability 117981879 -
Gray Television, Inc.